Skip to main content

Poll: Your Interest in the Olympics

The Olympics are here again. Just how interested are you in the Olympics game, an international gathering of the world's best amateur athletes, who are in it for no money or corporate sponsorships, and who are exposed to the highest level of fair competition presided over by the least-biased judges and referees in order to arrive at a final medal count that best reflects the total athletic prowess and opportunity of each nation?

(Okay, that was little bit sarcastic. To be fair to the Olympics, sports, after all, are at their core about inequality.)


  1. As often happens with egalitarianism, some are more equal than others.

    We have watched some of the coverage of the Olympics, but we are far from "glued" to our TV. It is amazing to watch what these athletes can do and almost equally amazing to hear the commentators rip to shreds the tiny little mistakes the rest of us only dream of being able to make ... something like, "Oh man, did you see that?! Her feet weren't in perfect alignment as she entered the water after doing a reverse quadruple!" (Implying, "what a loser!")

    I think I'm more struck with each Olympics how humanistic it all is at its base. The Olympics Games are about pushing the limits of what people can do physically. I'm also struck with how much into themselves some, but fortunately not all, of the athletes are. Some do what they for the glory of their country; far fewer do it for the glory of God; and many (most?) do it for their own glory ... to prove something. That's pretty much what I heard Bolt say last night.

    Thanks for making me think about this whole thing and to crystalize my random thoughts about the Olympics.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog


Read this in English.





今週初めて黒澤明の『隠し砦の三悪人』という映画を見ました。この三悪人とは、だれですか? 三船敏郎が演じる真壁六郎太(まかべろくたろう)と二人の百姓です。この3人の登場人物の関係はとても面白くて、全ての人間の弱さも愛される性質も示します。


Movie Review: A Better Life - Part 2

This is the second part of a two-part review of A Better Life. The first part dealt more with the background issue of illegal immigration, whereas this part focuses more on the movie itself.

In the movie, neither the undocumented immigrants (representative of all the undocumented, but particularly those with upright motives) nor the police (representative of the legal system, including courts, prisons, and immigration) is entirely at fault. Both are stuck in an imperfect, human system.

The viewer is led to sympathize with the undocumented man, an honest landscaper who wants nothing but to work hard so that his one son can have a better life. He’s away from home; his wife left him when his son was little; he has next to nothing; when he does acquire something (a lawn business and pickup with equipment) it gets stolen from him. And yet, the movie does not excuse what he does wrong nor does it try to show him as a man victimized and ruined by the consequences of his actions.

Apart fr…