Skip to main content

Book Review: Literary Theory: An Introduction

Two virtues I appreciate in book reviews are conciseness and objectivity. I have usually tried to keep my reviews concise, but overly personal reactions always find a way of slipping in. I recently saw a friend's reviews on Goodreads and was inspired to adopt his format, which is both concise and objective, of simply giving reasons to read or not to read a book. This seems to me to avoid personal impressions and rants, while keeping the review fairly short. We will see how it works.

Reasons to read Literary Theory: An Introduction, by Terry Eagleton:
  • To get an accessible overview of 20th-century literary theory (schools of thought covered: phenomenology, hermeneutics, reception theory [or reader response theory], structuralism, semiotics, post-structuralism, and psychoanalysis. This overview of the chapters shows, first, that Eagleton gives a more British than American overview, and second, that he gives a wide-ranging overview that helpfully shows the influences of philosophy and linguistics on literature and theory.
  • To gain an appreciation of the different schools of literary theory and their positive contributions. Eagleton, a Marxist critic, does not dismiss anyone, from the phenomenologists to the New Critics to the deconstructionists.
  • To understand the basics of Jacques Lacan's thought.
  • To understand the basics of Julia Kristeva's thought.
  • The previous two points should not be underestimated.
Reasons not to read Literary Theory: An Introduction, by Terry Eagleton (or at least not in its entirety):
  • It does not provide a full history or overview of literary theory (i.e., from at least Plato and Socrates on). It covers little more than the 20th century.
  • It does not provide a current history of literary theory, from the end of the 20th century into the 21st. The essay provided as the Afterword in my 2008 Anniversary Edition slightly mitigates this.
  • It does not provide an overview of Marxist or feminist criticism. Eagleton tries to argue that this was not necessary because all literature is ideology and all theory is ultimately political.
  • Too much attention is given to psychoanalysis--a whole chapter, and a long one at that. This is understandable, though, given that Eagleton first wrote the book in the 80s.


Popular posts from this blog

Movie Review: A Better Life - Part 2

This is the second part of a two-part review of A Better Life. The first part dealt more with the background issue of illegal immigration, whereas this part focuses more on the movie itself.

In the movie, neither the undocumented immigrants (representative of all the undocumented, but particularly those with upright motives) nor the police (representative of the legal system, including courts, prisons, and immigration) is entirely at fault. Both are stuck in an imperfect, human system.

The viewer is led to sympathize with the undocumented man, an honest landscaper who wants nothing but to work hard so that his one son can have a better life. He’s away from home; his wife left him when his son was little; he has next to nothing; when he does acquire something (a lawn business and pickup with equipment) it gets stolen from him. And yet, the movie does not excuse what he does wrong nor does it try to show him as a man victimized and ruined by the consequences of his actions.

Apart fr…


Read this in English.





今週初めて黒澤明の『隠し砦の三悪人』という映画を見ました。この三悪人とは、だれですか? 三船敏郎が演じる真壁六郎太(まかべろくたろう)と二人の百姓です。この3人の登場人物の関係はとても面白くて、全ての人間の弱さも愛される性質も示します。