Skip to main content

Today in Language: Antoine Court

One of my academic interests is the Huguenots (French Protestants), and in particular the Huguenots who crossed the Atlantic Ocean to settle in North America. Antoine Court, born on March 27, 1696, never made it across the Atlantic as far as I know, but he was a significant Huguenot minister and historiographer in Europe. He fled only as far as Switzerland. 

The Huguenot exodus from France, mainly after the revocation of the Edict of Nantes in 1685 under Louis XIV, went in every direction. Two amazing features of it are the severe economic impact on France as thousands of Huguenots left and the way in which the French Protestants  usually assimilated quickly and painlessly in the new societies/countries they chose as their homes.

I hope to post much more information on the (North American) Huguenots in the near future. I recently gave a presentation on the topic at the South Carolina Foreign Language Teachers' Association conference in Columbia, S.C., and I will be presenting an expanded version of that same paper at the convention for the American Association of Teachers of French in Montreal, Quebec, this July.


Popular posts from this blog


Read this in English.





今週初めて黒澤明の『隠し砦の三悪人』という映画を見ました。この三悪人とは、だれですか? 三船敏郎が演じる真壁六郎太(まかべろくたろう)と二人の百姓です。この3人の登場人物の関係はとても面白くて、全ての人間の弱さも愛される性質も示します。


Movie Review: A Better Life - Part 2

This is the second part of a two-part review of A Better Life. The first part dealt more with the background issue of illegal immigration, whereas this part focuses more on the movie itself.

In the movie, neither the undocumented immigrants (representative of all the undocumented, but particularly those with upright motives) nor the police (representative of the legal system, including courts, prisons, and immigration) is entirely at fault. Both are stuck in an imperfect, human system.

The viewer is led to sympathize with the undocumented man, an honest landscaper who wants nothing but to work hard so that his one son can have a better life. He’s away from home; his wife left him when his son was little; he has next to nothing; when he does acquire something (a lawn business and pickup with equipment) it gets stolen from him. And yet, the movie does not excuse what he does wrong nor does it try to show him as a man victimized and ruined by the consequences of his actions.

Apart fr…