Skip to main content

Today in Language: La mort de l'auteur de "La mort de l'auteur"

Quoi dire du renommé Roland Barthes ? Bien que j'aie lu « La mort de l'auteur » (qui n'est qu'un article tout court, et non pas tout un livre comme j'avais toujours pensé ; l'article se trouve dans l'ouvrage Le bruissement de la langue), je m'intéresse beaucoup plus à l'œuvre d'une ancienne étudiante de Barthes : Nancy Huston. Soit que je m'identifie avec une personne d'entre deux (ou plusieurs) cultures soit qu'elle est vraiment un grand écrivain, j'aime les livres de Nancy Huston et je veux lire prochainement son Dire et interdire, sa thèse de maîtrise avec Barthes. En fait, ce livre a été publié en 1980, la même année que Roland Barthes est mort le 25 mars. 
Roland Barthes authored "The Death of the Author" in 1968 and himself died March 26, 1980. We should probably all read the essay, even though the author of it also died, and even though Barthes' argument is highly suspect. If you take it as so much grandstanding on his part, then the whole idea of the death of the author can at least help to balance a study of author intent with other factors inherent to language and text themselves.

Don't go looking for "The Death of the Author" on Amazon or in your library or through WorldCat. It's not a book (like I always thought it must be before I actually read it; after all, something that so influenced literary criticism and linguistics much surely be more than a mere essay!) but you can find it in the collection Image-Music-Text.


Popular posts from this blog


Read this in English.





今週初めて黒澤明の『隠し砦の三悪人』という映画を見ました。この三悪人とは、だれですか? 三船敏郎が演じる真壁六郎太(まかべろくたろう)と二人の百姓です。この3人の登場人物の関係はとても面白くて、全ての人間の弱さも愛される性質も示します。


Movie Review: A Better Life - Part 2

This is the second part of a two-part review of A Better Life. The first part dealt more with the background issue of illegal immigration, whereas this part focuses more on the movie itself.

In the movie, neither the undocumented immigrants (representative of all the undocumented, but particularly those with upright motives) nor the police (representative of the legal system, including courts, prisons, and immigration) is entirely at fault. Both are stuck in an imperfect, human system.

The viewer is led to sympathize with the undocumented man, an honest landscaper who wants nothing but to work hard so that his one son can have a better life. He’s away from home; his wife left him when his son was little; he has next to nothing; when he does acquire something (a lawn business and pickup with equipment) it gets stolen from him. And yet, the movie does not excuse what he does wrong nor does it try to show him as a man victimized and ruined by the consequences of his actions.

Apart fr…