Skip to main content

Homi on the Humanities

Homi Bhabha, director of the Mahindra Humanities Center at Harvard, has some helpful (and lucid) remarks on his director's welcome page in regard to the nature of and need for the humanities. Check out the website for his center and watch this short video where he articulates similar ideas:


Bhabha makes several statements in the video that are central to his understanding of the humanities and, I think, key in expanding what our view of the humanities can be. He says for example (the following quotations from the movie are "cleaned-up" and not verbatim transcripts):
We need to make a distinction between the humanities as a certain set of disciplines which have always been associated with the humanities--literature, religion, philosophy, classics of various cultures, language--these are the disciplines we usually recognize as the humanities disciplines. But the humanities also provide a climate of opinion or a culture of knowledge, something wider than these disciplines.
Reread that last line and you will see what Bhabha is driving at. I am not sure that I would limit the creation of a "climate of opinion" or a "culture of knowledge" to the humanities. But the humanities certainly are central and perhaps even the key area of academic knowledge and investigation in the creation of the academic climate/culture. Bhabha goes on to give three reasons for this; I have noted a keyword for each reason in bold.

First, "The humanities focus very much on interpretation, how we take information and through interpretation create what we call knowledge."

Second, it is particularly through the humanities that we find ourselves "reflecting on moral values, social values, cultural values in times of transition."

Third, "The humanities are extremely important in making connections between the human sciences, the social sciences, and the hard sciences. Why? Because it features interpretation and transition so centrally."

I like how he ties together the essence of the humanities (interpretation and transition)--an essence that remains whether one is studying literature, language, philosophy, or theology--with the ability to relate the humanities to other areas of knowledge. Of course, as Sokal and Bricmont reminded us, we must be extremely careful when trying to draw such connections, especially between the humanities or social sciences and the hard sciences. This is something that critics tend to say Bhabha has not done well in his own work on postcolonialism and cultural studies.


Popular posts from this blog

Movie Review: A Better Life - Part 2

This is the second part of a two-part review of A Better Life. The first part dealt more with the background issue of illegal immigration, whereas this part focuses more on the movie itself.

In the movie, neither the undocumented immigrants (representative of all the undocumented, but particularly those with upright motives) nor the police (representative of the legal system, including courts, prisons, and immigration) is entirely at fault. Both are stuck in an imperfect, human system.

The viewer is led to sympathize with the undocumented man, an honest landscaper who wants nothing but to work hard so that his one son can have a better life. He’s away from home; his wife left him when his son was little; he has next to nothing; when he does acquire something (a lawn business and pickup with equipment) it gets stolen from him. And yet, the movie does not excuse what he does wrong nor does it try to show him as a man victimized and ruined by the consequences of his actions.

Apart fr…


Read this in English.





今週初めて黒澤明の『隠し砦の三悪人』という映画を見ました。この三悪人とは、だれですか? 三船敏郎が演じる真壁六郎太(まかべろくたろう)と二人の百姓です。この3人の登場人物の関係はとても面白くて、全ての人間の弱さも愛される性質も示します。