Skip to main content

Honesty: An Intellectual Standard(s)

Intellectual standards are important, so much so that they are taken for granted. There are some that I know I take for granted (The Critical Thinking Community has a good list for starters), but there are others that I think should be spelled out, oh, every few weeks or so, especially for the benefit of academics, intellectuals, journalists, politicians, and the like--those who tend to be the ones speaking and publishing the most often and thereby forming climates and cultures of opinion and thought.

The following standards could all be included under the superordinate standard of intellectual honesty. This is the most important intellectual standard, the violation of which may be the only mortal academic sin. Love can cover a multitude of sins when it comes to clarity, accuracy, precision, etc. But dishonesty in academic work is unpardonable. So, four intellectual standards relating to honesty:

1) I must be forthright about my biases and perspectives, my blik. NOTE: Objectivity is a bias, but "bias" does not equal "bad."

2) I must try to understand those with whom I disagree before beginning a critique and then must state their views in a way they would agree with.

3) I must not write about things I know I do not understand. NOTE: This is different from writing about things on which I am not an expert, which is not objectionable in the least but should nonetheless be policed...

Turkish MPs reach a compromise.
4) I must be up front when writing about things on which I am not an expert or fields in which I have not earned a degree but nonetheless understand and want to comment on.

It must of course be noted that all standards for intellectual debate and interaction may be summarily dismissed if one has either a sturdy walking cane or a jarring right hook. Upon reflection, it would seem that the real unpardonable sin in academia is an under-appreciation of the physical.

Preston Brooks reasons with Charles Sumner.
political cartoon by J.L. Magee


Popular posts from this blog


Read this in English.





今週初めて黒澤明の『隠し砦の三悪人』という映画を見ました。この三悪人とは、だれですか? 三船敏郎が演じる真壁六郎太(まかべろくたろう)と二人の百姓です。この3人の登場人物の関係はとても面白くて、全ての人間の弱さも愛される性質も示します。


Movie Review: A Better Life - Part 2

This is the second part of a two-part review of A Better Life. The first part dealt more with the background issue of illegal immigration, whereas this part focuses more on the movie itself.

In the movie, neither the undocumented immigrants (representative of all the undocumented, but particularly those with upright motives) nor the police (representative of the legal system, including courts, prisons, and immigration) is entirely at fault. Both are stuck in an imperfect, human system.

The viewer is led to sympathize with the undocumented man, an honest landscaper who wants nothing but to work hard so that his one son can have a better life. He’s away from home; his wife left him when his son was little; he has next to nothing; when he does acquire something (a lawn business and pickup with equipment) it gets stolen from him. And yet, the movie does not excuse what he does wrong nor does it try to show him as a man victimized and ruined by the consequences of his actions.

Apart fr…