Skip to main content

Jesus, Fanon, and Huston on Childhood

I recently read the following quotations on children/childhood:
Le malheur de l’homme est d’avoir été enfant. (Peau noire, masques blancs, 188)
Translation: "Man's misfortune is having been a child" (Frantz Fanon).
Après tout, au fond, notre « vrai » moi est bien celui, rabougri et ridicule, de l’enfance…, n’est-ce pas ? (Lettres parisiennes, 60).
Translation: "After all, deep down, our 'true' self is really the shriveled, ridiculous one of our childhood, isn't it?" (Nancy Huston).
Fanon and Huston both made me think of Christ's words about the little children: "Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these" (Matthew 19:14).

Certainly all three of these quotations are removed from their context (which is probably only unfair to the original meaning in the case of Fanon). But they pack a whole lot of philosophy into short sentences. Fanon and Huston are both onto something, though they may not realize what (sinful human nature, which goes back to childhood, or birth to be precise). They understand that all human problems (particularly, for them, injustice, racism, psychological exile, loneliness) go back to childhood, in other words to our humanness. Unfortunately they miss the solution, which is contained in Christ's simple invitation to all children. If we realize and accept that Christ is always ready to forgive us (if we repent and become like little children again, if we no longer are), then we can begin to work toward Christ-likeness in all areas of life.


Popular posts from this blog


Read this in English.





今週初めて黒澤明の『隠し砦の三悪人』という映画を見ました。この三悪人とは、だれですか? 三船敏郎が演じる真壁六郎太(まかべろくたろう)と二人の百姓です。この3人の登場人物の関係はとても面白くて、全ての人間の弱さも愛される性質も示します。


Movie Review: A Better Life - Part 2

This is the second part of a two-part review of A Better Life. The first part dealt more with the background issue of illegal immigration, whereas this part focuses more on the movie itself.

In the movie, neither the undocumented immigrants (representative of all the undocumented, but particularly those with upright motives) nor the police (representative of the legal system, including courts, prisons, and immigration) is entirely at fault. Both are stuck in an imperfect, human system.

The viewer is led to sympathize with the undocumented man, an honest landscaper who wants nothing but to work hard so that his one son can have a better life. He’s away from home; his wife left him when his son was little; he has next to nothing; when he does acquire something (a lawn business and pickup with equipment) it gets stolen from him. And yet, the movie does not excuse what he does wrong nor does it try to show him as a man victimized and ruined by the consequences of his actions.

Apart fr…