Skip to main content

A Must-Read, 2nd ed.

I now own the second edition of A Dictionary of Stylistics! It was an excellent birthday gift and now I can return the library copy of the edition.

When it comes to editions, it is probably almost always best to have the most recent. Three qualifications to that statement: 1) The most recent edition is best unless you are doing a comparison of editions or want to see what the older information was in a previous edition. 2) The most recent edition is best even if an older edition is better (by whatever criteria) simply because the newest edition should have the most current information. 3) Number 2 does not hold in the case of all college textbooks, which can be updated at an annoyingly frequent pace and can also be too expensive.

In regard to printings, however, I'm a bit more ambivalent. I'm not convinced of the necessity to have the first printing of an edition. An amazing professor of mine argued for getting the original printing of a book. The context was fiction, and he was referring to a novel by Patrick Chamoiseau. I suppose in the case of fiction a case could be made.

What do you think? Always update editions? Always go for the first printing?


Popular posts from this blog


Read this in English.





今週初めて黒澤明の『隠し砦の三悪人』という映画を見ました。この三悪人とは、だれですか? 三船敏郎が演じる真壁六郎太(まかべろくたろう)と二人の百姓です。この3人の登場人物の関係はとても面白くて、全ての人間の弱さも愛される性質も示します。


Movie Review: A Better Life - Part 2

This is the second part of a two-part review of A Better Life. The first part dealt more with the background issue of illegal immigration, whereas this part focuses more on the movie itself.

In the movie, neither the undocumented immigrants (representative of all the undocumented, but particularly those with upright motives) nor the police (representative of the legal system, including courts, prisons, and immigration) is entirely at fault. Both are stuck in an imperfect, human system.

The viewer is led to sympathize with the undocumented man, an honest landscaper who wants nothing but to work hard so that his one son can have a better life. He’s away from home; his wife left him when his son was little; he has next to nothing; when he does acquire something (a lawn business and pickup with equipment) it gets stolen from him. And yet, the movie does not excuse what he does wrong nor does it try to show him as a man victimized and ruined by the consequences of his actions.

Apart fr…